10
2025-02
The term "low-altitude economy" has long been proposed, but the gathering and development of the industry require time and space to brew. The widely recognized first year of the low-altitude economy is the recently passed year of 2024. We can see that the national and various provincial governments have intensively issued policies and legal documents related to the low-altitude economy, and many draft opinions awaiting promulgation are on the way. In 2024, the national two sessions for the first time included "low-altitude economy" in the government work report; on December 27, 2024, the Development and Reform Commission's Department of Low-Altitude Economy officially made its debut. In Shandong, on November 2, 2024, the Shandong Provincial Government Office issued the "Three-Year Action Plan for High-Quality Development of Low-Altitude Economy in Shandong Province (2025-2027)", viewing the low-altitude economy as a representative of strategic emerging industries and new productive forces, and formulating an action plan to promote high-quality development of the low-altitude economy. Guangzhou directly issued local regulations, the "Guangzhou Low-Altitude Economy Development Regulations", which will be implemented on February 28, 2025. This is a looming "three-dimensional space" industrial revolution that will transcend the public air transport phase and enter the era of low-altitude economy in everyday living spaces.
2025-02-10
10
2025-02
In economic life, when a debtor is unable to repay a due debt, they may negotiate with the creditor to settle the debt through a method known as "debt repayment through rent." For example, the debtor may rent out their property or other real estate to the creditor, using the exemption or offset of rent to repay the debt, or by collecting rent to offset the previously owed debt. This situation is common in real estate financing, corporate financing, personal loans, and other transactional activities, as it allows the debtor to quickly resolve debt disputes and delay repayment.
2025-02-10
07
2025-02
Plaintiff A filed a lawsuit in court, stating that Plaintiff A is a shareholder and legal representative of a certain company, which has now been deregistered. On November 14, 2014, a certain company signed a construction contract for the installation of outdoor heating pipelines in a certain community with a property management company, stipulating that each household would be charged 35 yuan per square meter based on the building area, with a total of 336 households, a total area of 30,000 square meters, and a total project cost of over 1 million yuan. After the project was completed and delivered for use by the property management company, they refused to settle and refused to pay Plaintiff A the project payment. The property management company was deregistered on November 14, 2019, and Defendant B is the sole shareholder of the property management company, holding 100% of the shares. Defendant C, as the original shareholder and founder of the company, should bear responsibility according to the law. Requests: 1. Order Defendants B and C to pay the Plaintiff the project payment of 1 million yuan plus interest; 2. Order Defendants B and C to compensate the Plaintiff for losses of 30,000 yuan; 3. Defendants B and C to bear the litigation costs of the case.
2025-02-07
07
2025-02
Xiao Chen was born in January 2008. His parents divorced by agreement in January 2023, with the agreement stating that his mother, Zhang, would directly raise Xiao Chen, while his father, Chen, would pay a monthly child support of 2000 yuan. After the divorce, Zhang moved in with her parents, and they helped her take care of Xiao Chen's daily life and school commutes. In early June 2023, Zhang suddenly passed away due to illness, and since then, Xiao Chen has been living with Zhang's parents. Zhang's parents believe that while their daughter was alive, they could assist in raising their granddaughter, but as they grow older and the child's expenses increase, they want to request that Xiao Chen's father, Chen, pay child support for Xiao Chen until she turns 18 and can live independently. However, Xiao Chen's father disagrees with paying child support and expresses his willingness to take care of the child himself. Xiao Chen believes that he has been living with his grandparents and that they mainly take care of his education and daily life. He has become accustomed to living with them. Additionally, his father, Chen, often travels for work and cannot take care of his life and studies, so he hopes to continue living with his grandparents. Although the grandparents are willing to care for the child, they are concerned about their financial ability to provide adequately. They are consulting a lawyer on how to resolve the issues of the child's living expenses and education fees.
2025-02-07
07
2025-02
Perspective | Conclusion and Remedies in Criminal Second Instance Cases
The second-instance criminal procedure, as the final review process in our country's criminal litigation system, is a key mechanism for correcting errors in first-instance judgments and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved. When a case enters the second-instance stage, the court conducts a comprehensive review of the factual determinations, application of the law, and procedural legality. This serves not only as supervision of the first-instance judgment but also as a secondary confirmation of the defendant's rights relief. However, after the second-instance ruling or judgment is made, if the parties still have objections to the outcome, how to achieve rights relief becomes an important link in the chain of judicial fairness. With the deepening reform of the trial-centered criminal litigation system, our country has gradually established a diversified relief system that includes trial supervision procedures, petition review systems, and prosecutorial appeals. These systems reflect the judicial principle of "correcting errors without fail" and also reflect the dynamic balance between judicial power and the right to sue. In current judicial practice, exploring the relief mechanisms after the conclusion of second-instance criminal cases is not only related to the realization of justice in individual cases but also serves as an important measure to assess the modernization level of our criminal justice system. Today, I will briefly analyze the conclusion methods of second-instance criminal cases.
2025-02-07
07
2025-02
The emergence of DeepSeek has provided a feature-rich and user-friendly AI tool for mainland China. Since its launch at the end of January 2025, its popularity has been continuously increasing, consistently topping the global AI software download charts. The DeepSeek algorithm model significantly enhances energy efficiency and effectiveness by optimizing data collection, comparison, retrieval, and analysis pathways. However, with the global in-depth research on DeepSeek comes a surge of hacker attacks aimed at its core algorithm. This indicates that advancements in algorithm technology also bring legal issues such as intellectual property protection, data privacy risks, and technological abuse. This article starts from the legal needs for algorithm protection, explores the legal regulation pathways in conjunction with the characteristics of algorithms, and proposes a comprehensive protection framework centered on intellectual property law, supported by data security law, and supplemented by algorithm transparency. It also envisions balancing technological innovation and rights protection through scenario-based governance and full-chain supervision.
2025-02-07
06
2025-02
In the Year of the Snake, may fortune abound and a prosperous journey begin. On February 5th, the Zhongcheng Qingtai Jinan region held a New Year commencement ceremony for 2025 in a festive atmosphere. All colleagues gathered together, filled with hope, exchanging the most sincere New Year wishes.
2025-02-06
06
2025-02
Perspective | Preliminary Legal Analysis of DEEPSEEK Distillation Behavior
DeepSeek is like a flash of lightning, illuminating the path for China's AI large models to overtake others, and has caused a huge shock in the international artificial intelligence field. This shock is not only due to its energy efficiency, high performance, and open-source nature, but also because of its innovative algorithms. It is speculated that its algorithms are comparable to the latest internal testing version of ChatGPT, which has led to accusations from leading foreign AI large models, spearheaded by ChatGPT, claiming that DeepSeek has illegally used their model's training data through distillation technology. The Spring Festival holiday has become a joyful ocean for tech enthusiasts. As a lawyer who is likely to be among the first to be replaced by artificial intelligence, I couldn't help but attempt to analyze the accusations against DeepSeek from a legal perspective, regarding the alleged illegal use of their data through distillation technology. Additionally, I will briefly analyze the issues surrounding the protection of AI large model algorithms. This analysis is based on hypothetical scenarios and is limited to academic research. If the feedback is positive, I will delve deeper into this topic.
2025-02-06
06
2025-02
On December 12, 2024, the Official Journal of the European Union published the Forced Labor Regulation (hereinafter referred to as the "Regulation"), aimed at prohibiting products made with forced labor from entering the EU market, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937. According to the relevant provisions of the Regulation, it will take effect the day after its publication in the Official Journal, and will be fully applicable from December 14, 2027, although some provisions will apply earlier, starting from December 13, 2024. The introduction of the Regulation has profound implications for China-EU trade, global supply chains, and international trade rules. This article will analyze the EU's Forced Labor Regulation from multiple perspectives, exploring its background, its impact on Chinese enterprises, and strategies for response.
2025-02-06
06
2025-02
Mr. Wang wishes to negotiate a divorce with his wife. Both parties have no objections to dissolving the marriage and the custody and visitation of their child, but they have differences regarding the division of property. The dispute between them lies in the fact that Mr. Wang sold his personal property before marriage and subsequently purchased another property registered solely in his name after marriage. They are in disagreement over whether this property should be considered marital property. The wife believes that this property was purchased during the marriage and, according to the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, it should be classified as marital property. She argues that the pre-marital property has appreciated in value, has generated rental income, and that the property purchased after marriage has also appreciated and generated rental income. From the perspective of the acquisition of the post-marital property and the composition of the funds used for the purchase, she asserts that all properties acquired after marriage should be considered marital property and are subject to division. However, Mr. Wang contends that this property is a transformation of the pre-marital property and should be classified as his personal property. He also claims that the renovations and leasing of both the pre-marital and post-marital properties were handled by their parents, thus he disagrees with the division.
2025-02-06
Zhongcheng Qingtai Jinan Region
Address: Floor 55-57, Jinan China Resources Center, 11111 Jingshi Road, Lixia District, Jinan City, Shandong Province
